BIODIESEL & SVO DISCUSSION FORUMS



Sponsors    Home    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Blending Discussion    water injection
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

Moderators: Shaun, The Trouts
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
0-60mph time, top speed, chassis dyno, etc.

Anything beyond the unreliable ButtDyno®.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Zedd:
0-60mph time, top speed, chassis dyno, etc.

Anything beyond the unreliable ButtDyno®.
are you just rambling or is that suppose to be a responce to my or someone elses post ???????


might try using the quote feature. This is getting hard to follow but maybe my brain is frozen.


_________________________
If you believe you can't YOUR RIGHT;

But equally so.... if you believe you can, YOUR RIGHT as well.
 
Location: North Tx | Registered: 23 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeepin, moggin Jessup (coachgeo):

Actually you have a dyno sheet that shows no power increase occurred in THAT ONE CAR. The results may NOT extrapolate to other vehicles or even the same type vehicle but with a different tune or different condition of the engine (less engine wear with no blow by for example).


A quote, happy?

What is the point of doing a dyno sheet at all if people are going to just blow it off as "it might not apply to other cars, even the same make and model"? How about you go put yours on the dyno and show me this magical HP that does not exist with pure water.

G@sser engine can get more power because it cools the air which means more fuel per CC of air and more power. Diesels do not care about A/F ratio so unless your engine is running poorly (rich) in the first place you will have no gain at all with pure water. You must add additional fuel through some kind of alcohol or more diesel to see any kind of power gain at all.

The fact that I got exactly 0HP with pure water simply means that my engine is running cleanly and is well tuned with no unburned fuel left over to burn through the addition more dense air.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
DCS
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Zedd:

What is the point of doing a dyno sheet at all if people are going to just blow it off as "it might not apply to other cars, even the same make and model"?



You would of course mean apart from this being logical and known fact?

So what you are saying is that what applies to one Vehicle applies to them all?
Given that, the logical extrapolation of your position is that because something doesn't work on your car, It won't work on any other..OR.. if something did work on your vehicle, It would give every other car the exact same performance boost??

If that is what you want to believe, I won't bother trying to convince you of anything else.

If you want to get some more power out of your Merc, I'll sell you this carburettor I have. I put it on my old car and the thing picked up 25 HP. I have several Dyno sheets to prove it. Luckily you have now told me there is no difference between make or model, you could put it on your 240D and you would also get an extra 25 Hp.


****

*
1978 Merc 300D.
Running Blend and 2 tank system with Home Made HE and water injection.
 
Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 26 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
How about you cut the cr@p and make a logical comparison.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
G@sser engine can get more power because it cools the air which means more fuel per CC of air




Are you sure?

Wouldn't a denser air charge result in less fuel per CC of air?
 
Registered: 26 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Air fuel ratio. Gassers must keep it within a certain range to run well. Evaporating water takes energy out of the air making it cooler. Cooler air is more dense.

The more air you can fit into the cylinder the more fuel must be used to keep it in that A/F range, bingo, more power.

I not as ignernt as som peple mak mi out ta bee.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
Sorry if it seemed like I was trying to make you look ignorant.

I wasn't aware of any mechanism in a gasser engine that automatically ballances air to fuel, so that's why I though you had a reverse conception of what happens when cooling the air charge in a gas engine. Don't diesels also do this?
 
Registered: 26 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Gas engines see the denser air as a higher airflow rate through the MAF sensor or carburetor and adjust the fuel rate to match.

Mechanical diesels only care about accelerator position, RPM and boost pressure. They can't adjust for airflow or boost above a certain pressure on their own.

Some electronic diesels that have an airflow sensor can adjust for additional airflow. However some only use it to monitor airflow to determine the needed EGR position and verify its proper operation. The Jeep liberty is a good example, it's MAF sensor is only part of controlling the EGR.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
i couldn't bare to sit through all the *****ing at each other on this thread to find the information i'm about to ask so forgive me if it's already been covered..
if the purpose of WI for VO purposes is cleaning the deposits, and i have a naturally aspirated old ford 6.9, why not spray a H20/m-OH mixture into the air intake with a spray bottle? say, after driving so everything's already warm, with a little extra gas so you're not just at idling speed?


84 E-350 clubwagon 6.9
 
Registered: 16 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by anson:...
if the purpose of WI for VO purposes is cleaning the deposits, ...
Actually that is not the total purpose, thats only one.

There is two purpose camps. In one camp is those looking for a tad bit of performance gain, such as passing a semi when in a sluggish MB 240D, and another camp are those like you mention who like the cleaning properties. Then there is most everyone else who are really somewhere in the middle. hmm.. guess that makes it three camps not two Big Grin

Also misting at a higher work load on the engine some hypothosize would better utilize the automized stuff you just misted in there so it does its job better.

From what I've read.. not tested myself, what you suggest with a squirt bottle on occasion at high idle should do what your thinking; cleaning it out some.


_________________________
If you believe you can't YOUR RIGHT;

But equally so.... if you believe you can, YOUR RIGHT as well.
 
Location: North Tx | Registered: 23 November 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
DCS
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by anson:

if the purpose of WI for VO purposes is cleaning the deposits, and i have a naturally aspirated old ford 6.9, why not spray a H20/m-OH mixture into the air intake with a spray bottle? say, after driving so everything's already warm, with a little extra gas so you're not just at idling speed?


You could probably do that and this is exactly what some mechanics do to clear out severe buildups in some engines. The thing is, are you really going to be inclined to do that with any regularity?

I also wonder if it would be enough. In my own experience, I noticed a change in the way the vehicle went within a few days driving which surprised me but I was still noticing very slight but constant improvements for months after. Given that I am putting around 10% of the total oil volume I use in water through the engine each month, that's going to be a lot of spraying. You may well not need that much water to keep the engine clean but I am doubtful that a bit of a squirt now and then is really going to do anything effective.

On my car, I have the water come on only at full throttle where some people think the best benefit is a virtually constant system. Either way would suggest a lot more water is needed to be effective than just a spray after the car has been driven.
The other thing that was touched on would be the potential for some water to remain in the engine or manifolds that may do damage if left to sit.

In practicality, I don't see someone being inclined to get out when they come home, open the bonnet, pull off the air cleaner cover, stand there for very long spraying water and giving the engine a rev and then putting everything back and the car away being something anyone would do very often.

Setting up a WI system can be very easy and probably save you a lot of time just doing a system in the first place than the time you would spend squirting water in the engine manually. The greater frequency of a proper system would also be miles more effective and do your engine a lot more good.


****

*
1978 Merc 300D.
Running Blend and 2 tank system with Home Made HE and water injection.
 
Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 26 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
as far as determining the benefit of running wi full time... once upon a time there was a drag strip in Orange County (coastal southern california) where race gas, alcohol and nitro- methane fueled vehicles frequently posted record runs the sucesses achieved there were generally attributed to humidity stemming from the coastal climate!
if a spark ignition engine can benefit from thermoexpansion imagine what a compression ignition engine will do for you!


80's NA VWs & NA and turbo Benzes, '91 E350 7.3 IDI NA
various bicycles with trailers and gearing low enough to ride up a cliff ;-)
 
Location: Pacific Southwest, USA | Registered: 28 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
hello shane.
after reading this post, i am extremely interested in learning more and most likely installing a home-made water injection system on my rig. i am waiting the arrival of my vegistroke system to install on my 99' F250. i have spent countless hours reading and educating myself on WVO fuel systems and the water injection system is something that i have just recently discovered and wanting to learn more about. therefore, i will continue to read more, but in the mean time, i would love to hear your advise and instructions on how to install a WJ system on my 99' PSD. I thank you so very much for your knowledge and time. I also noticed that you live in VA. I currently live in Allentown, PA, but have family in Lynchburg VA and find myself driving down to VA once a month. Thanks again. You can reach me either on this site or jsbasham77@gmail.com
Jonathan Basham
quote:
Originally posted by mjrchode:
Water injection works and it works well. Place the water injection jet after the turbo and after the intercooler. In the Dodges 5.9 Cummins I have done I installed the jets in the pipe that runs from the intercooler to the air horn on the intake manifold. On the older Powerstrokes w/out intercooler we put the jets right after the turbo. I did one older 6.5 Chevy and we put it right after the turbo before the intake.

Don't place the water jet before the turbo or you WILL be replacing it. Over time the water acts as an abrasive and wears the edge of the impeller fins down. Decreases turbo efficiency and puts metal in the cylinder. Water in the atmosphere is small enough it is not a problem but when you are dumping 12 oz a minute right before the turbo it will wear it down quickly.

Water injection in a diesel does exactly what DCS wanted to do. It cleans the combustion chamber. It will also cool the combustion chamber so to much might not be a good thing. When the water evaporates and expands Aquamist states a .5 increase in compression ratio. Their statement not mine.

Muleears - Please do not do the washer pump water/meth injection or do it if you want but the washer pumps will not atomize well enough. You are after a super fine mist like what would come out of a Windex bottle or equivalent. Much finer than a fuel injector.

If anyone needs any help or advise please shoot me an e-mail or we can do it here. I can dig out all of my old documentation and help anyone design or talk you through an install. I set up several Hot Shot haulers in TX set up water/meth injection systems that could be turned on/off or automatically when needed. Most of them wanted them for long mountain hauls when going up to Colorado but some of them ran them all of the time. You can also trigger off of boost, EGT, throttle position, etc. These systems required a lot of water. Most of them mounted an extra tank (Jazz fuel cell or the like) just for the water.

HTH,
 
Registered: 22 November 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
how much water will it take to clean
valve deposits, rings, piston tops?
that is up for conjecture!
on this forum and others ppl have
mentioned italian tuneups. a period
of time of hard driving that supposedly
scubs the encrusted layer of carbon
off the tops of the pistons.
a milimeter or 2 worth of carbon buildup,
that is quite a tall order - if you ask me.
also what exactly is hard, and long?
is this the stuff that www.snopes.com
is made of?

I have rebuilt numerous engines; air, watercooled, gas as well as diesel and i have never seen one without significant carbon buildup!!

can anyone offer any concrete data?

p.s. carbonated water is used in restaurants
to aid removal of carbon deposits from grills
and the like


80's NA VWs & NA and turbo Benzes, '91 E350 7.3 IDI NA
various bicycles with trailers and gearing low enough to ride up a cliff ;-)
 
Location: Pacific Southwest, USA | Registered: 28 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
also please keep im mind water heated beyond 75deg f continues to expand!

there are likely other phenomena that relate
to its use in a wi system.

http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/anmlies.html


80's NA VWs & NA and turbo Benzes, '91 E350 7.3 IDI NA
various bicycles with trailers and gearing low enough to ride up a cliff ;-)
 
Location: Pacific Southwest, USA | Registered: 28 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
For what it's worth I think DCS is on the right track....
A while back I removed the head to inspect an engine (300 D turbo) that had been running VO with a water injection system...
The engine was just like new inside...
Injectors, valves, everything was clean and beautiful....
I would highly recommend installing a water injection on any veg powered car...
 
Registered: 01 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Welcome! Tell us more ! you a mechanic?


99 E350 psd
 
Location: central, east coast FL | Registered: 04 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
On the performance side, water expands about 1600 times as it is converted to a vapor state. So it seems that water injection would/might give somewhat of a performance increase. Just my $.02
 
Location: Ladera Ranch, CA | Registered: 29 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Water alone provides zero power increase. There is no "steam engine" effect.
 
Location: Colorado | Registered: 27 September 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  
 

Sponsors    Home    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Blending Discussion    water injection

© Maui Green Energy 2000 - 2009