
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
member 2009 Sponsor |
5% FFA would be 5% by weight.
Assuming a liter of your oil weighs 920g. 920x.05= 46g/280= .164mol (the 280 represents a possible fatty acid molecular weight). Assuming you esterified all the FFA (not really possible) you could create .164mol H2O per liter of oil. .164/18g = 2.95g H2O. (18g represents the MW of H2O). CH3OH+R-COOH -> R-COOCH3 + H2O One mole of FFA combines with one mole methanol and produces one mole of water. .164 x 32.05 = 5.26g/.792= 6.64ml methanol consumed. It looks like your math is correct. I think our difference comes from yours being rounded up. I drag my math out to three significant digits then round up at the end. It makes a difference on small quantities. 5% FFA is not really that high. That equates to a NaOH titration of ~6.5ml |
|||
|
|
Member |
Thanks! That was a more cogent and succinct answer than I could have hoped for. I have a few followups if you (or anyone) could find the time:
First: If 5% FFA (by weight) is not a poor quality WVO then what is? 15%? Secondly: I'm also assuming 1% water (by weight) is a good estimate for content of emulsified water in WVO, but maybe 2% or even 5% is better (for poor quality WVO). For both of these questions I'm just wondering what the best / mean / worst case scenario is, based on the forum's experience. Finally, how do you derive the titration amount of NaOH to be 6.5g? Is it based on the amount of 'H' in the catalyst available to 'loan' a proton? Would it take twice was many mol of HCL to catalyze the essterification of FA as of H2SO4, and three times as many as mol as anhydrous H3PO4? In other words, if we assume that 1 L of 5% FFA oil contains .164 mol of FFA, then could we derive:
? I think I might have just answered my last question. Thanks again, and thanks in advance! |
|||
|
|
member 2009 Sponsor |
Furious,
This is correct.
Almost. The calculations you have based on the Hydrogen equavelence is accuracte for acid/base neutralization reactions but not necessarily for use as a catalyst. Most of us use way less than 8g H2SO4 to catalyse an esterification reaction of 5% FFA. The problem with HCL is it doesn't come in a pure enough form. I think the purist % you can get is about 40% with the other 60% being water. H3PO4 is considered a weak acid in that it doesn't completely ionize, it only donates one (or slightly more) hydrogen. Combined with it not coming in over 85% purity creates a problem. We use Sulfuric acid mainly because it is inexpensive, easily aquired, and very effective. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Let's assume that the H3PO4 is in solution with MeOH, not water. Can I assume that on average 1.2 (or something) 'H' is ionized per molecule and use the equations above? What property of an acid tells you how much 'H' is ionized? Thanks again |
|||
|
|
member 2009 Sponsor |
I don't know what can be assumed as far as how much H is dissocated. You could create a solution using sulfuric and a solution of Phosphoric and compare the PH of the two, increase the molar concentration of the phoshporic until it reaches the PH of the sulfuric solution. The Dissocation ~Constant or Kpa is what tells you roughly how much (H) an acid will dissocate. At least that's how I understand it. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Thanks for the reply. I'll see if I can figure it out. At this point I'm just curious as to how this whole chemistry thing works
|
|||
|
|
member 2009 Sponsor |
Your welcome, that's what we do.
Me too. |
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

