|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
Hi Travis,
look here (van Gerpen paper)for a brief explanation of the reaction: http://www3.me.iastate.edu/biodiesel/Technical%20Papers...20after%20review.pdf good luck Dieter - Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited - Albert Einstein, 1929 |
|||
|
|
Member |
Thanks, very informative. So as I read the paper, the water/methanol was removed. Is everybody out there who does acid/base removing the water? I have done successful acid/base without removing the water, but never could get the post-acid treatment titration to below 4. Is this why? I read on the forum a formula for acid/base that did NOT require water removal. Is this not correct?
thanks Travis Allen |
|||
|
|
Member |
The formula I used was dkenny's, whereas no draining is done between the stages. Is there anything wrong with this? I have good yields, but don't quite pass 3/27. If you do drain, is the water on top or bottom? I would think it would be on bottom, but other posts say it's on top.
Travis Allen |
|||
|
|
Member |
Hi Travis,
I think water removal is nessesary because the water stops the process of esterificaion. Thats why van gerpen et al are using a two stage acid esterification with water removal between the two process stages. In their paper they described their tests, where they didnt reached a ffa content below 2% with only one step. hope that helps good luck, Dieter - Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited - Albert Einstein, 1929 |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

