BIODIESEL & SVO DISCUSSION FORUMS



These forums are sponsored by Forum Members and Sponsoring Vendors.
Sponsors    Biodiesel & SVO Home    Biodiesel & SVO Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Acid Esterification    Van Gerpen's FFA stripping by ethanol?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Shaun, The Trouts
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
Has anyone tried stripping FFA's with warm ethanol?

It's suggested in one of Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock. After stripping, the WVO could be base esterified and the ethanol/FFA mix acid catalyzed separately.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
Which paper? Link please!


~Erik

Tractors imageUseful Biodiesel-related links
Support International Microbusiness - Kiva
"The ability to defend a position does not make you wise in doing so."
"I'm after sustainable, independent, sensible energy use and application, regardless of what particular energy carrier that may entail. "
 
Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 09 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
Has anyone tried stripping FFA's with warm ethanol?

It's suggested in one of Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock. After stripping, the WVO could be base esterified and the ethanol/FFA mix acid catalyzed separately.


Yes, I also would like the link.

The triglycerides(WVO) are transesterified with a base catalyst not esterified. You can esterify FFA's with ethanol as well as methanol if you use a strong acid catalyst. The FFA's have no strong attraction to any alcohol by itself to enable you to separate them from the triglycerides.

Heat, below vaporization, will speed up most chemical reactions. Converting VO to Biodiesel is a chemical reaction, not a dilution.
 
Location: The Land Between Two Rivers | Registered: 14 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The FFA's have no strong attraction to any alcohol by itself to enable you to separate them from the triglycerides.



Since the FFAs are FREE, wouldn't they be relatively easy to seperate? I mean, aren't they essentially just chains of fatty acids broken off the original triglyceride molecules? (like branches broken off a tree)

Aren't they free to move in the veggie oil almost like dissolved fuel additives, rather than chemically bonded components?

If FFAs are truly free, I can't help but wonder if an even very small difference in weight between FFAs and mono/di/triclycerides couldn't be used as a means of centrifugal seperation via a continuous process extremely high G-force centrifuge?

Then again, since seperated FFAs would still need conversion, would it even worth it to seperate them out of the rest of the oil rather than simply using a 2 stage esterification/transesterification process?
 
Registered: 26 September 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock

Try this link
ways of processing bio
 
Location: Nimbin Australia | Registered: 04 December 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sinbad:

Try this link
ways of processing bio
Nope - darn. This isn't a paper and contains no useful information on the subject in question. The only mention of ethanol and FFA separation is a segment from a list. There are no references either. Thanks for posting though.


~Erik

Tractors imageUseful Biodiesel-related links
Support International Microbusiness - Kiva
"The ability to defend a position does not make you wise in doing so."
"I'm after sustainable, independent, sensible energy use and application, regardless of what particular energy carrier that may entail. "
 
Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 09 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
I e-mailed Jon a link to this discussion. Maybe something will come of it.


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I will have to find where I saved a paper of IPA's ability to dissolve triglycerides as well as FFA. I think it said that isopropyl will even become misible with vegoil at around 60-70C.

This isn't the article I was looking for, but it starts the discussion. This one is just talking about IPA from 75%to 99% pure so one could distill it to just the azeotrope for reuse. It could also pick up left over water from feedstock drying. The feedstock could also be re-dried after IPA/water extraction of the FFA.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/4278g65134600772/

Andy
 
Registered: 02 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Still looking for the paper, gave up finding where on the hard drive it was and starting typing in statements from the paper hoping to find it via google.

Here is where it can be downloaded from: Click here http://cigr-ejournal.tamu.edu/submissions/volume8/FP%20...al%2023March2006.pdf

In the process, I found a great book exactly on oil/FFA extraction:
Technology and Solvents for Extracting Oilseeds and Nonpetroleum Oils
http://books.google.com/books?id=jqUjKBplqPcC

Pages 28-31 go over some data on oil extraction. FFA are more polar than oil so they should dissolve easier.

Andy
 
Registered: 02 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
Sorry gents, www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/36244.pdf

I'll re-read and find the page number.

To clarify since some of you have misunderstood: this is a discussion of a way to remove FFA's from WVO without reacting them by solvent stripping the FFA's from WVO prior to reaction.

Edit: read page 59, second from last paragraph of the link for Trent's comments on solvent stripping of FFA's using polar solvents that are partially immiscible with triglycerides.


Actually, Trent's comments are all worthy of discussion Smile
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
quote:

Since the FFAs are FREE, wouldn't they be relatively easy to seperate? I mean, aren't they essentially just chains of fatty acids broken off the original triglyceride molecules? (like branches broken off a tree)

Aren't they free to move in the veggie oil almost like dissolved fuel additives, rather than chemically bonded components? If FFAs are truly free, I can't help but wonder if an even very small difference in weight between FFAs and mono/di/triclycerides couldn't be used as a means of centrifugal seperation via a continuous process extremely high G-force centrifuge?


Yes, but they are so chemically similar and miscible with triglycerides; they are hard to remove with anything but a high speed, continuous liquid-liquid tubular centrifuge (huge $$.)



quote:
Then again, since seperated FFAs would still need conversion, would it even worth it to seperate them out of the rest of the oil rather than simply using a 2 stage esterification/transesterification process?


I think possibly. You could collect the FFA fractions from every ten batches of WVO-->bioD conversion and save them up. Then, you could spend a day just acid esterifying them separately. This is what the discussion is about.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by PGBiodiesel:
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
Has anyone tried stripping FFA's with warm ethanol?

It's suggested in one of Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock. After stripping, the WVO could be base esterified and the ethanol/FFA mix acid catalyzed separately.


Yes, I also would like the link.

The triglycerides(WVO) are transesterified with a base catalyst not esterified. You can esterify FFA's with ethanol as well as methanol if you use a strong acid catalyst. The FFA's have no strong attraction to any alcohol by itself to enable you to separate them from the triglycerides.

Heat, below vaporization, will speed up most chemical reactions. Converting VO to Biodiesel is a chemical reaction, not a dilution.


"transesterification" is a misnomer that us chemists hate Wink

The proper chemical name for base catalyzed esterification is the saponification reaction. Or, more precisely, "SN2 substitution reaction."
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
It's suggested in one of Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock. After stripping, the WVO could be base esterified and the ethanol/FFA mix acid catalyzed separately.


Assuming the ethanol:FFA ratio is low, couldn't the ethanol be used once acid esterified as a portion of the alcohol used in the base reaction? Water content would obviously be the limiting factor.
 
Location: The Deep South | Registered: 06 December 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
"transesterification" is a misnomer that us chemists hate Wink

The proper chemical name for base catalyzed esterification is the saponification reaction. Or, more precisely, "SN2 substitution reaction."
I'm not sure which chemist you're referring to as "we," but this simply is false.

Saponification is a hydrolysis reaction that forms salts of carboxylic acids (soap). Methyl esters are NOT salts and saponification is an undesirable side reaction. Transesterification, or substitution of alcohols, is the appropriate reaction descriptor.


~Erik

Tractors imageUseful Biodiesel-related links
Support International Microbusiness - Kiva
"The ability to defend a position does not make you wise in doing so."
"I'm after sustainable, independent, sensible energy use and application, regardless of what particular energy carrier that may entail. "
 
Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 09 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by ebztz:
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
"transesterification" is a misnomer that us chemists hate Wink

The proper chemical name for base catalyzed esterification is the saponification reaction. Or, more precisely, "SN2 substitution reaction."
I'm not sure which chemist you're referring to as "we," but this simply is false.

Saponification is a hydrolysis reaction that forms salts of carboxylic acids (soap). Methyl esters are NOT salts and saponification is an undesirable side reaction. Transesterification, or substitution of alcohols, is the appropriate reaction descriptor.


Well, we'll have to agree to disagree because my O-chem prof hated "transesterification" and so do I. In chemistry, "trans" refers to a double bond arrangement, which has absolutely nothing to do with this reaction and is a misleading non sequiter.

Saponification IS the correct term, despite what you learned on the interweb. It just happens that instead of an -OH nucleophile, we have placed a better nucleophile (methoxide anion) there, but the reaction mechanism is the exact same SN2 substitution reaction which proceeds through a tetrahedral carbanion reaction intermediate.

There are forward and reverse reactions possible for the class of SN2 substitutions generally referred to as hydrolysis: saponification is one.

So, let's just call it SN2 substitution, eh Wink

When Wikipedia and my former O-chem prof disagree...O-chem prof wins. Smile

Are we on topic???
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by RickDaTech:
quote:
It's suggested in one of Van Gerpen's papers as a possible method for handling high FFA feedstock. After stripping, the WVO could be base esterified and the ethanol/FFA mix acid catalyzed separately.


Assuming the ethanol:FFA ratio is low, couldn't the ethanol be used once acid esterified as a portion of the alcohol used in the base reaction? Water content would obviously be the limiting factor.


I was thinking that way too. I guess it would also depend on how much evaporation happened while you were waiting to collect enough.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Nick Lockard>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
quote:
Originally posted by ebztz:
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
"transesterification" is a misnomer that us chemists hate Wink

The proper chemical name for base catalyzed esterification is the saponification reaction. Or, more precisely, "SN2 substitution reaction."
I'm not sure which chemist you're referring to as "we," but this simply is false.

Saponification is a hydrolysis reaction that forms salts of carboxylic acids (soap). Methyl esters are NOT salts and saponification is an undesirable side reaction. Transesterification, or substitution of alcohols, is the appropriate reaction descriptor.


Well, we'll have to agree to disagree because my O-chem prof hated "transesterification" and so do I. In chemistry, "trans" refers to a double bond arrangement, which has absolutely nothing to do with this reaction and is a misleading non sequiter.

Saponification IS an appropriate (if somewhat sloppy) term, despite what you learned on the interweb. It just happens that instead of an -OH nucleophile, we have placed a better nucleophile (methoxide anion) there, but the reaction mechanism is the exact same SN2 substitution reaction which proceeds through a tetrahedral carbanion reaction intermediate.

Unfortunately, even the O-chem text author (Jones, 2nd Ed. Organic Chemistry) uses sloppy language here, and chemists are often lazy in using the same reaction names for both the forward and reverse reactions Frown

So, let's just call it SN2 substitution, eh Wink

When Wikipedia and my former O-chem prof disagree...O-chem prof wins. Smile

Are we on topic???
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Lockard:
Well, we'll have to agree to disagree because my O-chem prof hated "transesterification" and so do I. In chemistry, "trans" refers to a double bond arrangement, which has absolutely nothing to do with this reaction and is a misleading non sequiter.
"Trans-" is a Greek prefix that is root found in a great deal of terminology. Your "non-sequiter" statement is a red herring; mistakes buried in language and terminology are still mistakes. Perhaps there is some movement among chemists to eliminate this terminology. Find me a single peer-reviewed source that states transesterification is improper terminology and I'll revise my viewpoint.

quote:
Saponification IS an appropriate (if somewhat sloppy) term, despite what you learned on the interweb. It just happens that instead of an -OH nucleophile, we have placed a better nucleophile (methoxide anion) there, but the reaction mechanism is the exact same SN2 substitution reaction which proceeds through a tetrahedral carbanion reaction intermediate.
Again, saponification is a hydrolysis reaction. Theres a critical difference when compared to transesterification.

quote:
Unfortunately, even the O-chem text author (Jones, 2nd Ed. Organic Chemistry) uses sloppy language here, and chemists are often lazy in using the same reaction names for both the forward and reverse reactions Frown
I have 6 university-sourced books (some Biodiesel-oriented, some O-Chem), not to mention a hoard of publications that all use the term "transesterification."

quote:
So, let's just call it SN2 substitution, eh Wink
Agreed; the mechanisms share this characteristic.

quote:
When Wikipedia and my former O-chem prof disagree...O-chem prof wins. Smile
Perhaps you're over-invested in this singular information source?

quote:
Are we on topic???
Nope, but when you claim expertise and make incorrect statements, there is a need to address the issue. I don't doubt you know more chemistry than I, as I'm not an expert chemist. I can walk one building over to ask the chem profs what they think any time I wish, however.


~Erik

Tractors imageUseful Biodiesel-related links
Support International Microbusiness - Kiva
"The ability to defend a position does not make you wise in doing so."
"I'm after sustainable, independent, sensible energy use and application, regardless of what particular energy carrier that may entail. "
 
Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 09 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ebztz:
Find me a single peer-reviewed source that states transesterification is improper terminology and I'll revise my viewpoint.

Perhaps you're over-invested in this singular information source?


quote:
Are we on topic???
quote:
Nope, but when you claim expertise and make incorrect statements, there is a need to address the issue.


I agree with you Ebztz.

I once knew a young high school student whoose science teacher claimed it was impossible to boil water until it froze. He was a very good teacher but he was very wrong on that particular topic.

For anyone to believe everything from one source over all else is only good in one particular instance.


Thankyou Ebztz for catching the details.
 
Location: The Land Between Two Rivers | Registered: 14 May 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PGBiodiesel:

For anyone to believe everything from one source over all else is only good in one particular instance.
This is exactly why we have peer-review; multiple sources (experts in the field) confirming the findings of the individual or group being published.

Truly off-topic, I can say I've learned more from my students (collectively) than from my professors. Perhaps is just the sheer volume, but most of the good questions and challenges I've been issued have come from students.


~Erik

Tractors imageUseful Biodiesel-related links
Support International Microbusiness - Kiva
"The ability to defend a position does not make you wise in doing so."
"I'm after sustainable, independent, sensible energy use and application, regardless of what particular energy carrier that may entail. "
 
Location: Wisconsin | Registered: 09 June 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

Sponsors    Biodiesel & SVO Home    Biodiesel & SVO Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Acid Esterification    Van Gerpen's FFA stripping by ethanol?

© Maui Green Energy 2000 - 2008