BIODIESEL & SVO DISCUSSION FORUMS

Sponsors    Home    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Biodiesel Discussion    8.7:1 and getting better!

Moderators: Shaun, The Trouts
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted
cross-posted at my blog and biodieselnow.com

That's our energy balance. From my blog:

quote:
I've finally set about to do a simple, "unofficial" energy audit of our production process, from the point we pick up the oil (we do not need to account for what it took to originally make, process, and deliver the oil, because it is in its second life), all the way through to its delivery. It's actually remarkably easy, assuming that my methodology isn't flawed, because currently all of the power we use in our whole process comes from either biodiesel (which we track usage of) or electricity (which we track usage of).

Typical numbers for one month: 800 gallons of fuel used by our trucks, plus 3458 kilowatt hours of electricity. If we were to use the 400 KW diesel generator at the plant site (not within our lease at the moment, unfortunately) to generate that electricity, operating at an average half capacity at 20 gal/hr, it would use 346 gallons of fuel.

So, we can estimate that we use roughly 1150 gallons of fuel to source, process, and deliver 10,000 gallons of fuel. That's a 8.7:1 positive energy balance, and it will get a lot better as we grow, because it doesn't take much more energy to make a lot more fuel!

Take that, David Pimentel!


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Common sense and simple math/science can tell you a lot.

David Pimentel uses neither.

As always, you are doing a fine and excellent job Kumar.

troy
 
Location: north america somewhere close to the midwest, or not | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted Hide Post
Thanks.



Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Kumar,

Thats sweet. Didn't know you were doing that kind of volume. Wish someone up here was, I can't find anyone doing it at all near Billings.


Doug Felt
Industrial Sales Manager

Petroleum Solutions
11111 Iota Drive
San Antonio TX 78217
(210) 661-2489
www.petroleumsolutionsinc.com

Texas Dieselcraft Distributor
Follow advice at your own risk.
 
Location: San Antonio TX | Registered: 22 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted Hide Post
PB, what's truly crazy is that we are NOWHERE NEAR as efficient with our energy usage as I'd like to be. We don't even use boilers for our heating. Yes, we certainly will eventually, but it's pretty amazing that we are currently operating at nearly 3 times the DOE rate, and a testament to what could be. Long live UFOs*!



*used fryer oils


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
What about the fossil energy in the methanol and KoH or NaOH? Are you accounting for that?


YVORMV - Your veg. oil results may vary, see www.burnveg.com/forum
95 Dodge Cummins 4x4 +87 300TD wagon Running on 2 tank WVO, 81 Mercedes 300D on V80/D20 blend
Low fossil house- 100% solar/wind power, 90% solar heated.
 
Location: N. Colorado | Registered: 31 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SunWizard:
What about the fossil energy in the methanol and KoH or NaOH? Are you accounting for that?


Aha! A flaw in my formula- if anyone can help with some data on that embodied energy, I'd appreciate it.


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
Posted Hide Post
If you COULD get to use that generator you could also use the waste heat from it to help heat your process. That would make it even more effecient. (CHP - Combined Heat & Power)

-Jim


www dot FryerPower dot com
1987 300DT (The sedan, not the wagon.) Some modifications to the fuel system.
1995 S350D Unmodified fuel system.
I plead the 5th.
 
Location: Middle Tennessee, Jack Daniel's country | Registered: 10 August 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
That sounds good, but what about the energy inputs of methanol, catalyst, water, etc?

Chris

oops, i posted this directly from my email, didn't see that'd already been mentioned.
I believe that Lyle at Piedmont Biofuels did an energy calculation on their fuel at the coop a few years ago, came up with a number similar to yours.
I don't have the numbers on these, but if I get a chance, I'll post.
 
Location: Pittsboro, NC | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BooneBiodiesel:
That sounds good, but what about the energy inputs of methanol, catalyst, water, etc?

Chris

oops, i posted this directly from my email, didn't see that'd already been mentioned.
I believe that Lyle at Piedmont Biofuels did an energy calculation on their fuel at the coop a few years ago, came up with a number similar to yours.
I don't have the numbers on these, but if I get a chance, I'll post.


Thanks. I remember him saying something like 7:1. I don't think methanol and lye would lower us that much, but we're certainly in the ballpark. These numbers really do showcase that the recycled fryer biodiesel industry is a different beast than the soy people.

My goal is now to double our energy balance to over 17:1. We are doing algae research with some partners- a wild strain growing on sewage. Because it's a wild strain, it's *only* projected to produce ~900 gallons/acre. Gee, I wonder what the energy balance on that will be...


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Methanol has a BTU content of 62,800 BTU/gal, so that's pretty straighforward to account for.

This is FAR lower than gasoline by the way.

If you want to be "fair" and "sophisticated" in your EROEI analysis, you would count the BTU content of the glycerin byproduct in FAVOR of your EROEI. That's how they make the EROEI numbers look somewhat positive on ethanol. They count the spent grain mash BTU's on the positive side of the ledger. Keep in mind, it all gets fed to cattle, but it does have some "energy" value. You could make exactly the same argument for the glycerin since cows are reported to love it!

We too can be sneaky and underhanded if we wish.

HTH,

troy
 
Location: north america somewhere close to the midwest, or not | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by troy:
Methanol has a BTU content of 62,800 BTU/gal, so that's pretty straighforward to account for.


Its not that straightforward, since you would need to count the energy input to make the methanol and KoH. That will be much more than the BTUs contained in it. I think most methanol is made from natural gas.

KoH has no BTUs (I don't think it burns) yet still requires a lot of BTUs to make it.


YVORMV - Your veg. oil results may vary, see www.burnveg.com/forum
95 Dodge Cummins 4x4 +87 300TD wagon Running on 2 tank WVO, 81 Mercedes 300D on V80/D20 blend
Low fossil house- 100% solar/wind power, 90% solar heated.
 
Location: N. Colorado | Registered: 31 August 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
member
2009 Sponsor
Posted Hide Post
I was thinking about this earlier today, and it's a really tough thing to include MeOH, KOH, and glycerin, which should really all be accounted for. Assuming the glycerin is being put to good use (broken up, some of it burned as fuel), even if the MeOH and KOH negatively affect the energy balance, I think we'll still be in the 7+ range.


Kumar Plocher
Yokayo Biofuels
Fueled for Thought blog
.........../ \..............
fueling / R \ evolution since 2001
'''''''''''''/____\'''''''''''''''''''

Sustainable Biodiesel...
 
Location: Ukiah, CA USA | Registered: 19 September 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Sponsors    Home    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Biodiesel Discussion    8.7:1 and getting better!

© Maui Green Energy 2000 - 2009